Assist Mi Legal AI Use Policy
Version starter-2026-06 · Effective June 17, 2026
userPolicy governing AI-powered functionality, human review, attorney responsibility, hallucination risks, confidentiality, automated communications, and prohibited reliance.
# Assist Mi Legal AI Use Policy
Version 1.0
Effective Date: ___________
## 1. Purpose
Assist Mi Legal provides artificial intelligence-powered features
designed to assist attorneys, legal professionals, and support staff
with administrative, organizational, communication, and productivity
tasks.
These features include, but are not limited to:
Matter organization
Email processing
Draft generation
Task creation
Calendar assistance
Time tracking assistance
Document summarization
Research assistance
Workflow automation
AI assistant interactions through chat, email, and other
communication channels
This AI Use Policy governs the use of all AI-powered functionality
provided by Assist Mi Legal.
## 2. No Legal Advice
Assist Mi Legal is a software platform and is not a law firm.
Neither Assist Mi Legal nor its AI assistant, Ava, provides legal
advice.
All content generated by the platform is provided for informational
and productivity purposes only.
Users are solely responsible for determining whether any output is
accurate, appropriate, complete, legally sufficient, ethically
permissible, or suitable for a particular matter or client.
## 3. Attorney Responsibility
Attorneys remain solely responsible for:
Legal analysis
Professional judgment
Legal advice
Court filings
Client communications
Compliance with applicable rules of professional conduct
Compliance with court rules
Compliance with applicable laws and regulations
The use of AI assistance does not transfer or reduce any
professional responsibility owed by an attorney to a client, court,
regulator, opposing party, or third party.
## 4. Human Review Requirement
Users must independently review all AI-generated output before
relying upon it.
Users should not assume that any output generated by the platform
is:
Accurate
Complete
Current
Legally correct
Suitable for filing
Suitable for client delivery
All AI-generated content should be treated as a draft requiring
human review.
## 5. Hallucinations and Errors
Artificial intelligence systems may generate information that is:
Incorrect
Incomplete
Misleading
Outdated
Fabricated
Unsupported by authority
Users acknowledge that AI systems may produce statements,
citations, facts, legal authorities, dates, quotations, case references,
or conclusions that are inaccurate or entirely fictional.
Users agree to independently verify all information before relying
upon it.
## 6. Client Confidentiality
Users remain responsible for determining whether information
entered into the platform may appropriately be processed using
Assist Mi Legal.
Users are responsible for:
Protecting confidential information
Protecting privileged information
Complying with professional obligations
Obtaining any required client consent
Evaluating the suitability of cloud-based processing
Nothing in this policy constitutes legal advice regarding
confidentiality obligations or attorney-client privilege.
## 7. AI Assistant Authorization
By enabling Ava or other AI-powered assistants within Assist Mi
Legal, the organization authorizes the platform to perform
automated processing on its behalf, including:
Categorizing communications
Organizing matters
Drafting responses
Creating tasks
Creating reminders
Generating summaries
Identifying requested actions
Suggesting workflow activities
Such automated processing is performed solely as a software
service and does not replace human oversight.
## 8. Automated Communications
Certain platform features may draft or facilitate communications on
behalf of users.
Users remain responsible for:
Reviewing communications
Verifying recipients
Confirming content accuracy
Ensuring appropriateness of transmission
Users are responsible for configuring any review and approval
workflows available within the platform.
## 9. Third-Party Services
The platform may utilize third-party artificial intelligence models and
service providers.
Users acknowledge that:
Third-party systems may be involved in processing requests.
Service providers may change over time.
Model outputs may vary.
Availability may vary.
Assist Mi Legal makes no guarantee regarding the performance of
any specific model or provider.
## 10. Prohibited Reliance
Users shall not rely exclusively upon AI-generated content when:
Providing legal advice
Preparing court filings
Making legal determinations
Advising clients on legal rights
Determining litigation strategy
Calculating legal deadlines
Evaluating compliance obligations
Independent professional review is required.
## 11. Limitation of Liability
Assist Mi Legal does not warrant that AI-generated content will be:
Accurate
Error-free
Complete
Reliable
Legally sufficient
Users assume all responsibility for the review, validation, and use of
AI-generated content.
## 12. Policy Updates
Assist Mi Legal may modify this policy from time to time.
Continued use of AI-powered functionality following an updated
policy constitutes acceptance of the revised policy.
## 13. Acceptance
By enabling or using AI-powered functionality within Assist Mi
Legal, the user acknowledges and agrees that:
1. AI output may contain errors.
2. Human review is required.
3. Assist Mi Legal does not provide legal advice.
4. Attorneys remain responsible for professional judgment.
5. Users are responsible for protecting confidential and privileged
information.
6. AI-generated content should be treated as draft material unless
independently validated.
I acknowledge that I have read and agree to the Assist Mi Legal AI
Use Policy.
Assist Mi Legal Attorney Ethical Use Addendum
Version starter-2026-06 · Effective June 17, 2026
attorneyAttorney-specific professional responsibility framework covering supervision, competence, confidentiality, privilege, AI-assisted work product, filings, and client communications.
# Assist Mi Legal Attorney Ethical Use Addendum
Version 1.0
Effective Date: ___________
## 1. Purpose
This Attorney Ethical Use Addendum ("Addendum") applies to
licensed attorneys who access or use Assist Mi Legal.
This Addendum supplements the:
Terms of Service
User Agreement
AI Use Policy
Email Assistant Terms
This Addendum is intended to support attorneys in understanding
their professional responsibilities when using technology-assisted
legal services.
Nothing in this Addendum constitutes legal advice regarding ethical
obligations.
Attorneys remain responsible for determining their obligations under
applicable laws, court rules, ethics opinions, bar guidance, and
rules of professional conduct.
## 2. Attorney Responsibility
The attorney remains solely responsible for:
Legal advice
Legal conclusions
Professional judgment
Client representation
Litigation strategy
Court filings
Legal research relied upon in representation
Communications with clients
Communications with courts
Compliance with professional obligations
Use of Assist Mi Legal does not transfer any professional
responsibility to the platform or its providers.
## 3. Technology Competence
Attorneys acknowledge that many jurisdictions require attorneys to
maintain competence regarding the benefits and risks associated
with relevant technology.
Attorneys agree to exercise reasonable judgment regarding:
Platform configuration
Security settings
User permissions
Review workflows
Data sharing practices
AI-assisted workflows
## 4. Supervision Obligations
Attorneys remain responsible for supervising work performed
through the platform.
This responsibility applies whether work is performed by:
Attorneys
Paralegals
Legal assistants
Interns
Contractors
Vendors
AI-assisted systems
Attorneys must exercise reasonable supervision over work product
generated, organized, or assisted by the platform.
## 5. AI-Assisted Work Product
AI-generated content should be treated as draft work product unless
independently reviewed and validated.
Attorneys agree to independently evaluate:
Legal analysis
Citations
Authorities
Conclusions
Recommendations
Draft pleadings
Draft correspondence
Attorneys should not assume that AI-generated content is accurate,
complete, or current.
## 6. Verification of Authorities
Attorneys are responsible for verifying:
Case citations
Statutory references
Regulatory references
Quotations
Procedural requirements
Filing requirements
No attorney should rely upon AI-generated authorities without
independent verification.
## 7. Confidentiality
Attorneys remain responsible for safeguarding confidential
information.
Attorneys should evaluate whether use of the platform is appropriate
based upon:
Client expectations
Applicable rules of professional conduct
Court orders
Protective orders
Contractual obligations
Confidentiality requirements
Nothing in the platform guarantees preservation of privilege or
confidentiality under every circumstance.
## 8. Attorney-Client Privilege
Determinations regarding privilege are legal judgments.
Assist Mi Legal does not determine:
Whether privilege exists
Whether privilege has been waived
Whether disclosure is permissible
Whether a communication is protected
Attorneys remain solely responsible for making these
determinations.
## 9. Client Communications
Attorneys remain responsible for all client communications.
This responsibility applies whether communications are:
Written by the attorney
Drafted by staff
Drafted by AI systems
Assisted by the platform
Attorneys should ensure communications are reviewed as
appropriate before transmission.
## 10. Court Filings
Attorneys remain solely responsible for all filings submitted to
courts, agencies, arbitrators, regulators, and tribunals.
Attorneys agree to independently review all filings prior to
submission.
## 11. Deadlines and Calendaring
The platform may assist with:
Scheduling
Calendar management
Deadline tracking
Reminder generation
Attorneys remain responsible for:
Monitoring deadlines
Calculating deadlines
Meeting filing requirements
Maintaining docket control
The platform should not be relied upon as the sole mechanism for
deadline management.
## 12. Delegation and Automation
The platform may automate administrative activities.
Attorneys remain responsible for determining whether automated
workflows are appropriate for a particular matter, client, or
circumstance.
Automation does not eliminate supervisory responsibilities.
## 13. Matter Management
The platform may:
Create matters
Categorize matters
Associate documents
Associate communications
Recommend classifications
Attorneys remain responsible for ensuring matter information is
accurate.
## 14. Conflicts of Interest
The platform may assist with organization and information
management.
Attorneys remain responsible for:
Conflict checks
Conflict analysis
Conflict waivers
Conflict management
No platform feature should be treated as a substitute for attorney
conflict review.
## 15. Reliance on Platform Output
Platform-generated output should be considered advisory,
administrative, and assistive in nature.
Final decisions remain the responsibility of the attorney.
## 16. Jurisdictional Compliance
Ethical requirements vary by jurisdiction.
Attorneys are responsible for understanding and complying with:
State bar requirements
Local rules
Court rules
Regulatory obligations
Ethics opinions
Assist Mi Legal does not warrant compliance with any specific
jurisdiction's requirements.
## 17. Professional Independence
Nothing in the platform is intended to interfere with an attorney's
independent professional judgment.
All legal decisions remain under the control of the attorney.
## 18. Acceptance
By using Assist Mi Legal, I acknowledge and agree that:
1. I remain responsible for professional judgment.
2. I remain responsible for client representation.
3. I remain responsible for protecting confidential information.
4. I remain responsible for supervising AI-assisted work.
5. I will independently verify legal authorities and legal
conclusions.
6. I will not rely exclusively on AI-generated content.
7. I remain responsible for all legal advice, filings, and client
communications.
I have read and agree to the Assist Mi Legal Attorney Ethical Use
Addendum.
Assist Mi Legal Email Assistant Terms
Version starter-2026-06 · Effective June 17, 2026
tenant_ownerTerms for enabling Ava and other assistant mailboxes to receive, analyze, categorize, summarize, draft, task, and automate email workflows under customer supervision.
# Assist Mi Legal Email Assistant Terms
Version 1.0
Effective Date: ___________
## 1. Purpose
These Email Assistant Terms ("Email Terms") govern the use of
email-based assistant functionality provided by Assist Mi Legal.
These terms supplement the Assist Mi Legal Terms of Service and
AI Use Policy.
In the event of a conflict, the Terms of Service shall control unless
otherwise specified.
## 2. Email Assistant Services
Assist Mi Legal may provide one or more AI-powered email
assistants, including Ava and other future assistant configurations.
The Email Assistant Services may:
Receive emails
Analyze email content
Categorize communications
Associate communications with matters
Create tasks
Create reminders
Generate summaries
Draft responses
Suggest actions
Facilitate workflow automation
Interact with Connected Services
The Email Assistant Services are intended to assist users with
productivity and workflow management.
## 3. Authorization
By enabling Email Assistant Services, Customer authorizes Assist
Mi Legal to process communications submitted to the platform or
received through configured assistant mailboxes.
Customer authorizes automated processing for purposes including:
Communication analysis
Matter organization
Draft generation
Workflow execution
Request fulfillment
Administrative assistance
This authorization remains effective until disabled by Customer.
## 4. Assistant Mailboxes
The platform may provide dedicated assistant mailboxes.
Examples include:
ava.workspace@team.assistmi.net
assistant mailboxes created by Customer
future assistant communication channels
Messages received through assistant mailboxes may be processed
automatically.
## 5. Communications Sent to the Assistant
Customer acknowledges that messages sent to assistant mailboxes
may be:
Read by automated systems
Processed by AI systems
Categorized
Indexed
Associated with matters
Used to generate drafts and workflows
Users should exercise appropriate judgment when transmitting
information.
## 6. Communications Sent by the Assistant
The platform may:
Draft messages
Suggest messages
Prepare responses
Facilitate communications
Customer remains solely responsible for:
Reviewing communications
Approving communications
Determining recipients
Determining legal appropriateness
Determining factual accuracy
No communication generated by the assistant should be assumed
accurate without review.
## 7. Review Workflows
The platform may provide approval workflows.
Examples include:
Draft review
Approval queues
Human review checkpoints
Supervisor approval workflows
Customer is responsible for configuring and utilizing review
workflows appropriate to its operations.
Assist Mi Legal does not guarantee that review workflows will be
enabled or properly configured.
## 8. Automated Actions
Customer may choose to enable functionality allowing the assistant
to perform actions automatically.
Examples include:
Creating tasks
Creating reminders
Updating matters
Organizing documents
Scheduling activities
Synchronizing systems
Customer assumes responsibility for any automation settings
selected.
## 9. Client Communications
Customer remains solely responsible for all client communications.
Nothing in the platform shall be construed as:
Legal advice
Professional judgment
Client representation
Attorney supervision
The assistant is a software tool and not a legal professional.
## 10. Attorney-Client Privilege
Assist Mi Legal is designed to support legal professionals.
Customer acknowledges that:
Privilege determinations are legal decisions.
Confidentiality determinations are legal decisions.
Ethical obligations remain the responsibility of attorneys.
Assist Mi Legal does not provide legal advice regarding attorneyclient privilege, confidentiality, waiver, disclosure, or ethical
obligations.
Customer is solely responsible for determining whether use of the
Services is appropriate for a particular matter or communication.
## 11. Matter Assignment
The assistant may automatically:
Create matters
Suggest matters
Assign communications to matters
Associate contacts with matters
Customer remains responsible for verifying all assignments.
Matter associations generated by the assistant may contain errors.
## 12. Workflow Execution
The assistant may attempt to fulfill requests identified within
communications.
Examples include:
Creating tasks
Scheduling reminders
Generating documents
Producing summaries
Updating records
Requested actions may be misunderstood, partially completed,
incorrectly completed, or not completed.
Users should independently verify all outcomes.
## 13. Connected Services
Email Assistant Services may interact with Connected Services.
Examples include:
Microsoft 365
Google Workspace
Clio
QuickBooks
SharePoint
Document repositories
Calendar systems
Company is not responsible for failures originating from Connected
Services.
## 14. Accuracy Disclaimer
The assistant may:
Misinterpret instructions
Misidentify requests
Misclassify matters
Draft inaccurate responses
Omit relevant information
Customer acknowledges these limitations and agrees to
independently review outputs.
## 15. Monitoring and Logging
To provide Services, Company may maintain logs relating to:
Email processing
Workflow execution
Assistant actions
System activity
Audit records
Such records may be used for security, troubleshooting, compliance,
and service improvement purposes.
## 16. Suspension
Company may suspend Email Assistant functionality if necessary
to:
Protect system integrity
Address abuse
Respond to security concerns
Comply with legal requirements
## 17. Limitation of Liability
Email Assistant functionality is provided on an "as available" basis.
Company makes no representation that:
Messages will be processed correctly.
Requests will be completed.
Communications will be delivered.
Drafts will be accurate.
Deadlines will be identified.
Matters will be classified correctly.
Customer assumes responsibility for supervising all assistant
activities.
## 18. Acceptance
By enabling Email Assistant functionality, Customer acknowledges
and agrees that:
1. The assistant is a software tool.
2. Human oversight is required.
3. Communications may be processed automatically.
4. Outputs may contain errors.
5. Customer remains responsible for all professional obligations.
6. Attorneys remain responsible for legal advice, filings, strategy,
and client communications.
Customer further authorizes Assist Mi Legal to operate configured
assistant mailboxes and perform automated processing as
described in these Email Assistant Terms.
Assist Mi Legal Responsible AI & AI Governance Statement
Version starter-2026-06 · Effective June 17, 2026
publicPublic trust-center statement describing Assist Mi Legal AI philosophy, human oversight, transparency, responsible automation, privacy, provider governance, hallucination risks, and attorney responsibility.
# Assist Mi Legal Responsible AI & AI Governance Statement
Version 1.0
Effective Date: ___________
## Our Philosophy
Assist Mi Legal was built on a simple principle:
Artificial intelligence should assist legal professionals, not
replace them.
Our goal is to reduce administrative burden, improve organization,
and help attorneys spend more time practicing law.
We believe that legal judgment, client advocacy, professional
responsibility, and ethical decision-making remain human
responsibilities.
Artificial intelligence can help attorneys work more efficiently, but it
should not replace professional judgment.
## Our AI Principles
Assist Mi Legal operates according to the following principles.
## 1. Human Oversight
AI should support human decision-making.
Important legal decisions should remain under the control of legal
professionals.
Assist Mi Legal is designed so that attorneys and authorized users
remain responsible for:
Legal advice
Client communications
Court filings
Legal analysis
Litigation strategy
Ethical obligations
AI-generated content should be reviewed before reliance or
distribution.
## 2. Attorney Responsibility
The use of AI does not transfer professional responsibility.
Attorneys remain responsible for:
Compliance with professional rules
Client representation
Confidentiality obligations
Professional judgment
Supervising work product
Assist Mi Legal is a technology platform and not a law firm.
The platform does not provide legal advice.
## 3. Transparency
We believe users should understand when AI is involved.
Assist Mi Legal strives to make clear when:
Content is AI-generated
Recommendations are AI-generated
Drafts are AI-generated
Automated processing has occurred
Users should not be surprised by AI activity occurring within the
platform.
## 4. Human Review
AI-generated content should be treated as draft material.
Users should independently review:
Draft communications
Summaries
Recommendations
Legal authorities
Research results
Workflow outcomes
AI output may contain errors and should be validated before use.
## 5. Responsible Automation
Automation should increase productivity while preserving human
control.
Assist Mi Legal may automate administrative activities such as:
Matter organization
Task creation
Email categorization
Document organization
Calendar support
Workflow assistance
Organizations remain responsible for determining which automation
features are appropriate for their operations.
## 6. Privacy and Confidentiality
Protecting customer information is a core design objective.
Assist Mi Legal is designed to support legal professionals working
with confidential information.
We strive to:
Limit access to authorized users
Segregate tenant data
Apply security controls
Support confidentiality obligations
Customers remain responsible for evaluating the suitability of the
platform for their legal, ethical, regulatory, and contractual
obligations.
## 7. AI Provider Governance
Assist Mi Legal may utilize third-party AI providers to deliver AIpowered functionality.
When evaluating providers, we consider factors such as:
Reliability
Security
Privacy practices
Performance
Operational maturity
Provider relationships may evolve as technology advances.
## 8. Data Minimization
We seek to process only the information necessary to provide
requested functionality.
Examples include:
Draft generation
Summarization
Categorization
Workflow execution
We strive to avoid unnecessary processing whenever reasonably
possible.
## 9. Security
AI functionality operates within our broader security program.
Security measures may include:
Authentication controls
Access controls
Encryption
Monitoring
Audit logging
Tenant isolation
Security practices continue to evolve as threats and technologies
change.
## 10. Accuracy and Hallucinations
AI systems can produce incorrect information.
This may include:
Incorrect facts
Incorrect citations
Incomplete summaries
Misunderstood instructions
Fabricated information
Assist Mi Legal does not guarantee the accuracy of AI-generated
output.
Independent verification remains essential.
## 11. No Legal Advice
Assist Mi Legal does not provide legal advice.
Ava is not a lawyer.
AI-generated content should not be interpreted as legal advice.
Users remain responsible for determining whether information is
accurate, appropriate, and legally sufficient.
## 12. Attorney-Client Privilege
Questions involving privilege, confidentiality, waiver, and
professional responsibility are legal determinations.
Assist Mi Legal does not determine:
Whether privilege exists
Whether privilege has been waived
Whether disclosure is appropriate
Whether a communication is protected
Users remain responsible for making these determinations.
## 13. Continuous Improvement
We continuously evaluate:
AI performance
Safety mechanisms
User feedback
Security controls
Workflow outcomes
Feedback from customers plays an important role in improving the
platform.
## 14. Customer Control
Customers control:
Which features are enabled
Which integrations are connected
Which users receive access
Which workflows are automated
Which permissions are granted
Organizations remain in control of their deployment.
## 15. Responsible Innovation
We believe innovation and responsibility should advance together.
As Assist Mi Legal evolves, we intend to continue developing AI
capabilities that:
Respect professional obligations
Support human oversight
Improve productivity
Preserve user control
Promote transparency
## Our Commitment
Assist Mi Legal was created to help legal professionals manage
work more effectively, not to replace lawyers.
We believe the future of legal technology is not attorney versus AI.
It is attorneys empowered by well-designed AI tools operating under
human supervision, professional judgment, and ethical
responsibility.
That principle guides how we build Assist Mi Legal today and how
we intend to build it in the future.